Department
of Women and Child Development, Govt. of Delhi in collaboration with
AFD-Pratidhi organized an interface with
Media representatives on “ Role of media building child Protection Environment”
on 20th September, 2013 with a view to develop a clear understanding
on Child Protection issues with reference to the provisions of the Juvenile
Justice (Care and Protect of Children) Act, 2000 and newly enacted law “The
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 as well as media
guidelines issues by the Hon’able High Court of Delhi.
A
total 25 participants participated in the interface, out of which 16 were from
media organizations. Some senior officers from Department of Women and child
development, Govt. of Delhi. also addressed the audience. The following issues were
discussed:
Contribution of
media: All
the participants appreciated media’s role in generating awareness among people
on child rights issues.
Nature of
reporting on juvenile in conflict of law: Many a times the flow and style of media reporting
makes lots of difference especially on juvenile in conflict with law. One of
the examples was the reporting in Nirbhaya case where a Juvenile was involved.
Due to inappropriate media reporting, a kind of fear and insecurity was created
among people vis-à-vis juvenile in conflict with law.
Misleading
reporting: Various
incidents were cited where the media reports give misleading information. It came
to the light that the reporters use their own sources, which is misleading at
times, to know the matter and write accordingly. It was suggested that a person
can be designated as spokesperson in every department so that any media person
can contact him to get the correct information.
Ignorance of law
among Govt. Authorities:
It was also said that government functionaries are not completely familiar with
the legal provisions pertaining to children. Participants discussed an incident
where the CWC chairperson himself was not fully aware of the provision of concealing
the identity of the victim. Therefore, it was suggested that such Govt.
functionaries should also be informed about legal provisions and its implications.

Reformative action should come in public domain: In the light of juvenile involvement in gang rape case, the failure of system to rehabilitate a convicted juvenile in conflict with law was discussed at length. The matter was what reformative action is taken to rehabilitate the juvenile in conflict with law within the institutions doesn’t come in public domain. Therefore, media should be permitted to enter in the institutions and see the reformative process of the children. A child may repeat the same action even after going back to community; therefore, follow up should also be done where media can also play a crucial role.
Discloser of
identity Vs Community services:
It has been observed that JJBs are not implementing the provision of community
services for rehabilitation of children in conflict with law because of the possibility
of discloser of identity of the children which can even jeopardize the rehabilitation
process of children and acceptability by the community.
Mandatory
reporting:
It was discussed that the mandatory reporting in case of child sexual abuse is
required as per the POCSO Act but many a times it makes the well-wisher of the
children party to the crime and they will have to appear in the court as
witness which people generally not willing to do. This needs to be looked into
and appropriately amended.